Evaluating Project Success
Learn about ways to evaluate project success.
Hello, and welcome to our impactful projects
and Planning series.
I'm Jami Yazdani.
In today's session, we'll talk about ways
to evaluate project success.
So what is project success?
How do we know that a project has been successful?
So is it if we have delivered everything we've
promised?
Is it if our users or clients are happy with
and can actually use what we've delivered?
Or is it if the team worked well together
and different voices were included?
So project success can mean a yes to all of
these questions, and more.
So one of the first steps in evaluating project
success is understanding what success means
for your organization, and your project.
Some common measures of project success in
mission driven environments include that the
project and project deliverables are completed
on time and under budget, which may also mean
meeting grant or other funding requirements
that the promise deliverables meet established
quality measures, and that the deliverables
are usable, and users are satisfied with them.
For many projects, we also want to consider
whether the deliverables are sustainable.
So did we create a program or service that
we can maintain?
What are the long term impacts on our community
and our users?
We may also want to consider the project itself.
So did we plan well, to include all relevant
stakeholders?
Did we create a collaborative working environment
that meets our organization's values?
As a project manager, it's often on us to
determine which of these measures are relevant
and important to our project.
Only then, are we in a position to evaluate
project success.
So let's dive into some of these measures.
And I'll share three ways we can evaluate
project success.
So one way is something called Earned Value
Management or EVM, which is a common practice
and project management for evaluating success
during the project timeline.
So now before your eyes, glaze over EVM is
actually much simpler than it sounds, it's
a big name for what is really a simple concept.
And so essentially, EVM involves setting a
baseline for your project scope, schedule,
and budget, and measuring progress throughout
the project against those baselines.
So it's really just about monitoring whether
your project stays within scope, is completed
on time.
And within budget.
Part of EVM.
Best practice includes that If changes need
to be made to your scope, schedule, or budget,
you have a formal process for making and then
communicating those changes.
And so I've done a whole session in the past
on project scope.
But with EVM in mind, we essentially set our
baseline during project planning by having
a written scope statement that clarifies our
projects purpose, we monitor our project to
avoid scope creep, making sure we aren't exceeding
scope by adding deliverables, features or
elements.
And if we do have to make changes to our scope,
we rewrite our scope statement and communicate
the new scope to our team and stakeholders.
Similarly, with schedule, our baseline is
our project schedule with those key deadlines
and milestones.
We monitor these throughout the project to
avoid delays.
And if we need to make changes to the schedule.
Again, we want to document those changes and
communicate that.
Same with project budget.
I recently did a session on budgeting that
offers a lot more information on creating
and tracking project budgets.
But our baseline is just that estimated budget.
We track our spending throughout the project
and we document and commute communicate any
changes.
So do note that EVM goes beyond just setting
a plan or baseline and monitoring progress.
It also asks that we document changes and
communicate those so it's clear Where we've
deviated from our plan.
The idea with EVM is that you can chart what
you expect from the project, monitor how the
project is performing against those expectations,
and anticipate future performance.
So many project management tools will allow
you to set baselines for your schedule and
budget.
And because the tool is already helping you
monitor progress, it can show you how far
off your baseline or your plan you actually
are, and what that might mean for future performance
and the project.
Now, for a great many mission driven projects.
This level of reporting may not be necessary,
but Earned Value Management is still important
to consider when evaluating project success.
At its core.
EVM is about making sure we are monitoring
project progress, so that we can mitigate
any delays or problems and make changes to
our plan as needed.
So planning for and paying attention to scope,
schedule and budget are usually critical to
project success.
And so they are a way of evaluating project
success throughout the project timeline.
Another way to evaluate project success is
by establishing quality measures for your
projects, deliverables.
What quality measures to use will depend on
your project and deliverables of course, now
for many projects, a quality measure might
be a key element or feature that must be included
in a deliverable or deliverables.
There might also be industry standards, government
regulations, acceptance criteria that the
deliverables must meet.
Or we may be planning to test our deliverables
with users and get their feedback.
As an example, for a project to develop training,
we may assess our training materials deliverable
by a list of topics the training must cover.
We may also assess the training materials
and our delivery methods against accessibility
standards.
And we may plan to do an attendee satisfaction
survey after a demo training session to measure
satisfaction with the training.
So for many mission driven projects, these
quality measures may be part of your funding,
or grant requirements.
If there are quality measures that are commonly
used to assess project deliverables in your
organization, I recommend creating a quality
assessment template.
So this could be a simple checklist or rubric
to help your project managers determine how
project deliverables meet standards, criteria
or regulations.
If you typically assess quality by gathering
user stakeholder feedback, sample surveys
or forum questions could also be shared as
a template as well.
Another way to evaluate project success is
through Project retrospectives.
And so, Project retrospectives are debriefs
involve considering what went well during
a project and what didn't to determine are
lessons learned so that we can apply those
lessons to other projects, and initiatives.
While there are a lot of approaches out there
to conduct in retrospectives often recommend
that project teams and key stakeholders at
least consider the following questions.
So first, what did we set out to accomplish?
So what was it that we were planning to do
when we started this project?
What did we actually accomplish?
So what was it that we ended up doing?
What went really well?
So what were the things that went exactly
as planned?
What was really easy?
What were our successes during the project?
And finally, what would we do differently
next time.
And so this question often leads us to what
didn't go so well.
So points of failure or delays, miscommunications
or ineffective planning.
Sometimes the things that didn't go well,
were outside of our control, and we couldn't
have planned for it.
But often, there are things that could be
improved if we were doing this project or
a similar project.
Again, Project retrospectives can be useful
tools for evaluating project success.
But we don't have to wait until the end of
a project to conduct a retrospective.
We can use project retrospectives during the
project.
So at the end of project phases, or iterations
to help us evaluate success when we can still
make changes.
So creating a culture of continuous improvement.
If we use standard templates for Project retrospectives,
and document and share those lessons learned
across our org conversation, we can also begin
to evaluate our project environment as a whole,
so that future projects are better and formed
and manage.
While project retrospectives help us consider
the past, they're actually very forward thinking,
nudging us toward how we can improve future
projects, and collaborations.
So that's a really quick introduction to three
ways we can evaluate project success across
the project timeline, we can use Earned Value
Management, or EVM.
To set a baseline monitor progress, and forecasts
the future of our project scope, schedule
and budget.
We can also measure the quality of our deliverables,
and we can conduct retrospectives during an
after our project.
If you'd like ideas for conducting a project
retrospective download our simple project
retrospective worksheet.
This free download is available at Yazdaniconsulting.com.
Resources.
If you need more hands on support, leading
and evaluating projects, visit our project
solutions page at Yazdaniconsulting.com projects
to learn about how we can help.
Great, so I'm happy to take any questions
you have about evaluating project success,
please add them in the comments.
I'm going to give folks a few moments to add
their questions.
There's always a bit of a streaming delay.
If I'm not able to answer your question live,
I am happy to respond later.
In the comments, you can also find all of
the ways to contact me at Yazdaniconsulting.com.
Contact.
So do please reach out to me if you'd like
to talk about projects.
Okay, so a question is I noticed that some
of the ways to evaluate success may occur
after a project and surveys sustainability?
What's the responsibility of a project manager
for what happens after the project?
And so this is a really great question.
While a project manager may not necessarily
be accountable for what happens after a project,
and I do think it's something we absolutely
want to consider, especially in nonprofits
and other mission driven environments.
If the project is creating deliverables folks
are going to use or we're designing programs
that will be ongoing, we really need to be
thinking about what happens after the project.
As we are planning for the project.
Beyond kind of delivering quality deliverables,
we may want to include training or documentation
or some kind of handoff process.
As a deliverable in our project, we may be
in a position to recommend assessments or
surveys that folks can use after the project.
Okay.
Another question is, how do we balance the
need for project evaluation, things like retrospectives
and surveys with the ethical considerations
of working with vulnerable populations?
So this is a really complex question that
probably deserves a more complex answer than
I have time to give here.
But I would really start with thinking about
why you want to evaluate Project 60s, are
you doing it to make sure that the project
deliverables are usable and valuable?
Is it to improve future projects, both are
valid, both are kind of best practice.
But my instinct is that we probably want to
be really careful about burdening folks who
aren't being paid with the latter type of
evaluation.
And so I do think, including users and user
input throughout a project, so not just waiting
till the end, can really help us make sure
that our deliverables are higher quality and
that they're usable.
And that's probably a better use of time and
kind of only manage measuring satisfaction,
and asking folks to give us more time at the
end of a project.
So great.
I would love to hear your thoughts on any
of these topics.
Feel free to comment or reach out with any
additional questions, or even share your experiences.
So thank you for participating in our impactful
projects and Planning series.
Visit Yazdaniconsulting.com/IPP to view all
of the sessions in the series and learn about
up Coming trainings Thank you